In order to come to a truly agreeable and reliable decision with neutrality, would we not have to include views and observations from all regions that apply to the problem?
If we wish to derive solutions by looking at only observational facts it would only make sense to have a representative from each view. I do not mean from both supernaturalist and naturalist, but rather from every group that could observe an event differently. For example, a person from a lower class may observe something in a completely different manner than someone from a higher class. We may all observe the same event but, even without supernatural or scientific thoughts, find a different meaning. So, when trying to come to the best solution for a problem we would have to look at every different angle to truly find the answer that would solve all aspects of the issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment